0 Comments
Taking a little extra time to focus on the why, I asked my students, "Why did I ask you to annotate this article about Texas Freedom Colonies?" Some students replied, "So we learn." Others said, "So we learn to annotate." They weren't wrong, but they also weren't understanding the underlying purpose of showing connections between reading and thinking by annotating. That's when I knew it was time to show them this cool graphic with my favorite mascot, Curious George. I explained that as I read their annotations some of them will be at stage 1-"Tell me what to do." But as they prepare to go to high school, I'm going to help them wanted them move to stage 2- "This is interesting. I'd like to learn more." Then when they have enough knowledge, we will move together to stage 3 where they will transfer their knowledge to create something new. . I'm halfway through my time with these kids, and I should be able to get out of the way. They should be able to find a spark and show their interest. But should is different from will. So when it was time to tackle a longer article jam-packed with new ideas, I knew I had to rethink my process. I didn't want to sacrifice learning because of low student stamina. The idea of splitting an article into chunks to jigsaw is familiar, but the success we had with annotating small bites of an article really felt like a win. In an informal closure poll, I asked, "Was it easier to read one paragraph?" YES! Much easier! "Did you still learn something?" YES! Here's what we did: 1st: I split the article into the 12 most valuable paragraphs. I made some minor edits so that a section could stand alone. Each student received their own worksheet, like the one below, with specific instructions, including underlining, drawing, defining keywords, annotating, and summarizing. I still have 2-4 students in each class who tried to avoid this assignment. They did a little underlining and stopped. They went to the bathroom. They did nothing. The brevity of the assignment meant I could conference with them and be sure they finished. There is nowhere to hide with just one paragraph in front of you. When everyone was finished - less than 10 minutes - they brought their sheets to the front of the room and hung them up based on whether they did show evidence of "power to the powerless people" or not. With so much evidence stacked up on one side, we had a fantastic visual to create an argument. This article clearly showed power to the people, but we couldn't ignore the evidence contradicting the supporting evidence. The contradiction is where history lies. Reconstruction was a period that showed promise and even power being given to the powerless, but that power was very short-lived. Now we have the curiosity to explore the rest of the story.
|
AuthorErin McCarthy is the 2020 Wisconsin Middle School Teacher and Wisconsin's Representative to the National Teacher of the Year Program. Archives
September 2025
Categories |
RSS Feed